<<
>>

Conclusions

Whether one is considering mortality in highly de­veloped or less developed countries, similar ques­tions frequently emerge: To what degree have public health and therapeutic interventions made a differ­ence? To what degree has economic development been responsible for increasing life expectancy? And to what degree are changes in individual behavior important?

It is generally agreed that in the developed coun­tries development itself has been responsible for most of the change.

In contrast, much of the improve­ment in mortality in less developed countries is said to have been caused by imported public health mea­sures, especially those that could be widely and in­expensively applied in the absence of fundamental changes in the socioeconomic characteristics of the population itself.

More evident disagreement surrounds the question of what is required to reduce mortality further in less developed countries: relatively modest technical as­sistance from abroad and a domestic policy of literacy and equitable food availability or major socioeco­nomic change. In developed countries, disagreement has to do with the degree to which individual behav­ioral changes, on one hand, and environmental changes, on the other, have been important, as well as what will be the future role of biomedical research and health care in addressing the health care prob­lems of the very old. The questions are fraught with political implications and the answers are by no means obvious.

Stephen J. Kunitz

<< | >>
Source: Kiple Kenneth F. (Editor). The Cambridge World History of Human Disease. Cambridge University Press,1993. — 1200 p.. 1993

More on the topic Conclusions:

  1. Conclusions