<<
>>

Fire and industrialization

The subterranean forest

Just as human history over the past 10,000 years has been the history of the agrarianization of the world, the history over the past 250 years has been the history of industrialization.

In the process, the anthroposphere has become one global constellation extending all over the planet, and its impact on the biosphere has become increasingly intense.

The term ‘industrialization' refers to the rise and spread of a new socio- ecological regime - the industrial regime, following the fire regime and the agrarian regime. It did not put an end to the older regimes. On the contrary, new applications of fire lay at the very core of industrialization: using fossil fuel to generate steam power and to smelt and refine iron. The smokestacks of the coal and iron industries and the red glow of furnaces at night became the icons of early industrialization.

There were also close connections with agriculture. Agrarian production had to provide a subsistence base for all workers employed in the mines and factories. Moreover, as soon as industrialization came to include the produc­tion of textiles and foodstuffs, the raw materials had to be supplied by farming. In return, factories started generating means of production for agriculture: first simple iron tools, then more complex new mechanized implements, and then, in the twentieth century, various types of combustion-driven machines and factory-made fertilizers and pesticides. By the end of that century, agriculture and industry in many parts of the world had become inseparable and often even barely distinguishable parts of an ‘agro-industrial complex' that leaned heavily on the use of fossil fuels.

The primary effect of industrialization was to make immense supplies of fossil energy available that had lain virtually unused by any living species. In the eighteenth century, a series of inventions (in other words, innovations in the field of information) opened the possibility of tapping these supplies and using them to generate heat and mechanical motion.

Similar to the way early humans had strengthened their position in the biosphere by learning to control the burning of wood and other organic material, their descendants now learned the art of using fire to exploit the energy contained in coal, oil, and gas.

Seen from a world historical perspective, these developments concerned humanity at large. But at closer quarters it was only a tiny section of humanity that took the lead and was the first to profit. A small entrepreneurial class in Britain had the advantage of being the pioneers of industrialization.

Industrialization started with single steam-powered factories - often called ‘mills' like their predecessors which were driven by wind or water - standing apart in the agrarian landscape, and forming, as suggested by the environ­mental historian Rolf Peter Sieferle, ‘industrial archipelagos'.[277] But from the very start, these ‘islands' were enveloped in a much wider context. Industri­alization was preceded by European overseas expansion, which gave a strong impetus to the process. British society in the eighteenth century was con­nected in many ways to a larger world: not just to the European continent but also to other continents. It had a strong navy and a large commercial fleet; trade with other continents (including the slave trade) brought in considerable wealth, while emigration across the Atlantic helped to relieve population pressures. The ensemble of these military, political, and eco­nomic relationships provided a robust infrastructure for the burgeoning

industries, guaranteeing protected access to a worldwide array of resources and markets.

The basis of industrialization was, literally, coal. As a fuel, coal had been used before, in ancient China and in medieval England, but that was always coal found at or near the surface of the earth, and its burning qualities were generally considered inferior to those of wood. Better coal was practically impossible to mine because it lay too deep, and the galleries dug to reach it were always in danger of being flooded by groundwater.

In eighteenth­century Britain, a rapid succession of inventions improving the efficiency of steam engines made it possible to get rid of the water by pumping it up. While the steam engines made coal mines accessible, the coal thus gained served as fuel for the steam engines - a positive loop effect. Soon afterwards railways developed, and the trains, drawn by steam locomotives, joined the same configuration of mechanical forces by which coal could be extracted, distributed, and applied for the industrial production of goods, ranging from iron and steel instruments to textiles and canned food. In this configuration, the energy delivered by steam engines was not a single independent cause, but an essential link, just as fire had once been an essential link in the changing balance of power between humans and other animals in the early Stone Age.

When people began exploiting the enormous stores of solar energy contained in coal, they entered, in Sicfcrlc's telling image, a ‘subterranean forest' of huge dimensions that, in many decades to come, turned out to be even more abundant than originally expected. Compared to the somatic energy of humans and their domesticated animals, the amount of energy now available for manufacturing and traction, whether measured in units of horse power, kilowatts, calories, or megajoules, was tremendous (see Table 8.ι).[278]

The ‘energy bonanza' has resulted in unprecedented technological devel­opment and economic growth. Although these processes affect the entire world population, the benefits are not equally shared by all; thus, as Weis- senbacher notes, some 2.5 billion people still depend on traditional biomass as their main fuel for cooking.[279] Fire also continues to show its Janus face: its destructive power is used for highly diverse productive applications, but also for deliberate destruction in war.

Table 8.ι Global estimates of population (in millions) and energy use (GJ/capita)

Year Population (million) Energy use (GJ/capita)
5000 BP 20 century, some leading European intellectuals rejected this scheme as incompatible with the outcome of scientific experiments and only giving rise to futile speculations.
Chemists extended the number of elements to many dozens, but they no longer included fire. The invention of the steam engine temporarily aroused a revival of scientific interest in fire in the field of thermodynamics. But that interest waned, and thermodynamics lost its central place in the natural sciences.

Except for narrowly defined technological research directed at fire preven­tion and fire fighting, the very concept of fire disappeared from scientific discourse, to be replaced by the far more abstract concept of ‘energy' - signifying a potential force that could not be directly seen, heard, smelled, or felt but could only be perceived in its effects.

The career of the subject of fire in science ran remarkably parallel to its virtual disappearance from both public and private view in everyday life. As noted in the previous section, while combustion continued to be used on an ever larger scale, it also became increasingly unwelcome. In the form in which people like to receive most of their extra-somatic energy, they prefer not to notice any traces of combustion.

Yet, while fire has indeed been eclipsed in scientific discourse and become hardly noticeable in daily life, it continues to be an essential ingredient of the human universe, the anthroposphere. It is omnipresent in industrialized soci­ety, even if the flames and smoke are hidden from view and smell. Fire and fuel continue to be indispensable in the production and distribution of almost all the food we eat and all the objects we handle, but we generally disregard this fact. Electricity has become the ubiquitous intermediary between fire as a source of energy and ourselves, as we use it for heating and cooling, for production and destruction, for transport and communication.

When thinking of fire, our associations tend to be mainly negative. Fire is dangerous, and fuel is dirty - this seems to be the prevailing sentiment, which is not easily reconciled with the fact that by far the greatest bulk of the electricity that is so highly valued is generated in power stations powered by fuel.

Although the actual estimates vary, it is generally known that the remaining supplies of fossil fuels are finite and, moreover, that burning them in such huge quantities as we do may cause irreparable damage to the entire biosphere. Since we live on a planet that is regularly visited by lightning and dotted with volcanoes we shall never be able to abolish fire. But our present burning practices will have to come to an end.

If we wish the global trend to electrification to continue, we will have to sever our bondage to fire and fuel. Currently, the generation of electricity produces more greenhouse emissions than any other industry.[281] The actual energy yields are spent inefficiently: far more energy is spent in producing, transporting, and preparing our food than we actually take in by eating.23 If these observations are correct (as I think they are), they imply that the present socio-ecological regime will have to be succeeded by a new regime, which will incorporate parts of the fire regime, the agrarian regime, and the industrial regime, but will also differ radically from its predecessors.

<< | >>

More on the topic Fire and industrialization: