<<
>>

U.S. Plans for Postwar Germany (1941-1945)

American policies for defeated Nazi Ger­many were shaped by domestic, military, and international—in particular alliance­political—considerations. The planning process moved between the poles of a lib­eral democratic commitment to self-deter­mination, peaceful international coopera­tion, and renunciation of retribution as expressed in the Atlantic Charter (1941), and the insistence on unconditional sur­render as well as the intent to eradicate Nazism as announced at the Casablanca Conference (1943).

Within the Roosevelt administration conflicts arose between those arguing that punitive measures would provoke bitterness and hatred among the Germans, thus undermining the prospects for peace, and others who ob­jected to swift reconstruction and rehabili­tation as inappropriate both in view of German war crimes but also as safeguards against renewed aggression. This intra-ad- ministrative ambivalence was resolved only when perceived cold war exigencies after 1945 gave an additional boost to those fa­voring Germany’s integration into the West as part of a double containment policy.

Contrary to persistent myths a “Carthaginian peace” was not envisioned at any point. Instead, the various plans were guided by the same intense desire to avoid the “mistakes of the past” (e.g., the Ver­sailles Treaty and interwar policy) and by a strong commitment to reform Germany in order to “prevent World War III.” All post­war planning had as its point of departure more or less explicit, yet conflicting, as­sumptions about the nature of the Na­tional Socialist regime and its place in Ger­man history. In order to solve the German problem, it first had to be properly under­stood. Competing political philosophies regarding America’s own domestic situa­tion translated into different visions for a peaceful international world order and contributed further to conflicting ideas for Germany. A pronounced sense of responsi­bility and anxiety about this “second chance” at peacemaking competed with concerns over how much overseas postwar engagement an exhausted American public would tolerate.

<< | >>
Source: Adam Thomas. Germany and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History. ABC-CLIO, 2005. — 1365 p.. 2005

More on the topic U.S. Plans for Postwar Germany (1941-1945):