<<
>>

Conclusions

As demonstrated by this synthesis, simple questions are frequently the most difficult to answer. Determin­ing which diseases were allochthonous in the Amer­icas before A.D. 1700 requires the expertise of nu­merous disciplines, including the study of evolution, ecology, microbiology, history, archeology, and geogra­phy.

The integration of diverse and sometimes contra­dictory sets of information provides a means of evalu­ating past and present assumptions and of suggesting future directions. Although skeptical of the possibil­ity of reconstructing the exact number of introduc­tions, or dates and places of entry during the Colum­bian period, I support serious interdisciplinary efforts aimed at establishing the nature of the parasitic en­vironment that confronted native populations during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. I hope that this preliminary synthesis will promote such efforts.

Ann Ramenofsky

<< | >>
Source: Kiple Kenneth F. (Editor). The Cambridge World History of Human Disease. Cambridge University Press,1993. — 1200 p.. 1993

More on the topic Conclusions:

  1. Conclusions
  2. Western and Central Eurasia
  3. Tiwanaku urban origins: distributed centers and animate landscapes
  4. Industrious revolutions in early modern world history
  5. Early polities of the Western Sudan